Andrew Huberman· PhD
And what we found in these studies, is that, that one question mattered in some cases, more than objective activity, but in all cases controlling for objective activity and predicting death rates.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And what we found in these studies, is that, that one question mattered in some cases, more than objective activity, but in all cases controlling for objective activity and predicting death rates.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And in one of the samples, it was a 71% higher risk of death rate. You know, if people rated themselves as feeling like they were getting less activity than others.