The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
We also did one other thing. We also gave them a GPS watch. Uh, why did we give them a GPS watch? Well, we did it for two reasons. One, we wanted to make sure they went on the walk. They didn't just go to Starbucks. And two, um, we wanted to see, did people get lost? Because if people got lost on the walk, maybe that wouldn't be restorative.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.