The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
which is what happened with for example hydroxychloroquine which didn't work now has been shown clearly not to work to treat or prevent disease yet it was approved under eua or convalescent plasma which is to say antibodies taken from people who survived the infection which again was heartily approved by the fda through this emergency use authorization also with the no evidence that it worked
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.