The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
here what we did was we took elderly men we were going to have them live in a retreat that had been retrofitted to 20 years earlier and had them live there as if they were their younger selves so they talked about things from the past as if they were just unfolding the results were incredible their Vision improved their hearing improved their memory their strength and they look noticeably younger
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.