The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
what does it actually mean it's a permission to use something which is to say that even though there aren't clear data showing that something is safe or effective or that it's a diagnostic it clearly works well we're going to allow it under this condition because we're under duress with this covet 19 pandemic so we're going to put it out there with the hopes that it works
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.