The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
one of these is that it slows wound healing the other thing is that it makes animals more susceptible to certain kinds of pathogens and those two things in the laboratory are not a big deal because they don't get wounded and we spend a great deal of time and effort to keep pathogens out of the colonies but in the wild those are very important causes of pathology and things that you need to work well
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.