The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it is very important that if you have severe back pain or persistent back pain and you're not able to alleviate it with non-surgical methods that you talk to a back expert perhaps even a surgeon there are cases for epidurals for painkillers for you know different types of rehabilitative approaches but Dr Stu Mill has also pointed out that there are a number of things that any and all of us can do by just self assessing that I think are appropriate for today's discussion
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.