The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and we see the part above the surface right that's the conscious mind right but there's a huge part of this Iceberg maybe 95% of it that's underneath the water right that there's this hulking mass that we don't see that's the unconscious mind right and it's feeding up to the conscious mind which is a much smaller part of our brain function right but it's the part that we're aware of right
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.