Andrew Huberman· PhD
it's it's estimated that every year we generate about two mutations in our um you know sperm DNA so you can imagine that you know a 40-year-old is going to have you know 20 or 40 more mutations um than a 20-year-old
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
it's it's estimated that every year we generate about two mutations in our um you know sperm DNA so you can imagine that you know a 40-year-old is going to have you know 20 or 40 more mutations um than a 20-year-old
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
50 mutations a year a generation usually gets spit out. It's in a nature paper. um probably between generations and there's always mutations occurring in 14-year-old fathers but it goes way up with 60-year-old fathers.
each yr. of father age = ~ 2 mutations.