Andrew Huberman· PhD
and therefore its vulnerability to things like sunlight which indeed can mutate the cells within the skin cause them to you know have disregulation of the expression of DNA and the production of other cells
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and therefore its vulnerability to things like sunlight which indeed can mutate the cells within the skin cause them to you know have disregulation of the expression of DNA and the production of other cells
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
UV light when it penetrates mostly that epidermal layer of the skin that outermost layer it can cause changes in the way that DNA functions it can cause mutations such that DNA which as many of you probably remember from high school biology DNA is transcribed into RNA and RNA is translated into proteins the proteins are the things that the cells produce they're actually made up of proteins well UV like can disrupt which DNA are expressed and how they are expressed in some cases leading to overproduction of too many cells or disruptions in the functions of cells and that's why people link UV light to skin cancer