Bryan Johnson· Author
So if you can uh do 90 it's better.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So if you can uh do 90 it's better.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So, we're going after longevity benefits and that's really in the 90-minute range and there is some truth to doing it.
but there is probably some benefit to less. We can't quantify that as well because we don't have the research but probably some HBOT is better than no HBOT.