The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
typically for our external beam machines we're doing it all remotely from behind a shielded wall so the vault in which the machine is placed is customuilt just to shield based on the angles that the machine can move through through
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
typically for our external beam machines we're doing it all remotely from behind a shielded wall so the vault in which the machine is placed is custom built just to Shield based on the angles that the machine can move through... essentially our dose when treating remotely is close to zero