Peter Attia· MD
now technically they've done the same thing they've both turned down the cigarette but the second person kind of has signaled a shift in
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
now technically they've done the same thing they've both turned down the cigarette but the second person kind of has signaled a shift in
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the second person says oh no thanks I'm not a smoker now technically they've done the same thing they've both turned down the cigarette but the second person kind of has signal to shift in identity change like they the first person is trying to be something they're not no thanks I'm trying to quit and the second person is saying I'm not a smoker it's just not something that I do
And the second person says, "Oh, no thanks. I'm not a smoker." Now, technically, they've done the same thing. They've both turned down the cigarette. But the second person kind of has signaled a shift in identity change.