Andrew Huberman· PhD
10-20min depending on how cloudy it is.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
10-20min depending on how cloudy it is.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I think the 20 to 30-minute protocol, two or three times per week is an excellent one, seems like a fairly low dose of UVB light exposure.
If you see some sunlight throughout the day, you would do yourself a great favor to try and chase some of that sunlight and get into that sunlight.
I think the 20 to 30 minute protocol two or three times per week is an excellent one. Even on a cloud covered day, you are going to get far more light energy, photons through cloud cover than you are going to get from an indoor light source, an artificial light source.