Andrew Huberman· PhD
Cones are mainly responsible for daytime vision, and the rods are mainly responsible for vision at night or under low light conditions, generally speaking.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
Cones are mainly responsible for daytime vision, and the rods are mainly responsible for vision at night or under low light conditions, generally speaking.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
you might remember cones are primarily for your daytime vision and they're clustered in the center of your visual sphere so in the center of the near the center of the what we refer to as the macula which is the central portion of the retina and the very center of the macula is the phobia right so that's primarily where the cones are the rods are in the periphery and they typically are responsible more for dim illumination vision like night vision and they're very good at picking up motion