The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Well um it's already been done actually like 20 30 years ago. Oh really? I was using fetal uh graphs and they just didn't take um some of them took. In fact um patients some patients got benefit from it. The side effects were also fairly severe. Um there were a variety of different reasons. What kind of side effects? Um like if you have too much dopamine, you can actually get diskynesas. So hyper movement.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Um like if you have too much dopamine you can actually get disanas. So hyper movement. So Parkinson one of the cardinal symptoms of Parkinson's >> hypo movement. >> Yeah. Yeah. uh bradicinesia specifically uh where you have slowed movements, slow to initiate movements as well. Um but if you have cells that are just pumping out dopamine, they can also be putting out too much and you get the opposite effect.