Andrew Huberman· PhD
Look into the distance (>20ft) >90 min per day.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
Look into the distance (>20ft) >90 min per day.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
The data say really to try and get at least 10 minutes of long distance viewing, so longer than 10 feet away from us, for every 30 minutes of closeup viewing.
if you're somebody, similar to the person who asks the question, that they're quote unquote "noticing" their vision is deteriorating, really try and balance out the amount of viewing that you're doing at close distance and long distance.
for every hour or so that you spend looking at things, say, a distance of 3 feet away or less, that you want to get at least one hour per day total, doesn't have to be all at once, of looking at things out in the distance or looking at things beyond 3 feet relative to the distance from your eye.
if you're going to be looking at things up close a lot which we all are nowadays you would be wise to also take a few minutes each day and try and view a horizon