The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
these people provide much of the backbone for the anti-vaccine movement today which is running the websites and the Facebook pages and the YouTube channels pumping out all this stuff now about the coronavirus up until December of 2019 and January and February of 2020 they was all about vaccines and autism and the MMR all that kind of stuff
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
by the the interplay between these two uh events the Wakefield paper and the O'Leary work they were able to manufacture the belief that the MMR vaccine causes autism