The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
I think it is much more likely that these are faulty tests or that there are pieces of the virus that are still making positive tests they don't actually say what type of test these are in these people and they are not actually infectious
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
now I am not convinced to this in any way shape or form Tommy sent me this paper this morning April 13 2029 three reports Moore recovered coronavirus patients testing positive again now I think we should guard against this news we do not know that this represents reinfection or reactivation but could just be the fact that this is a flaw in the testing or or a reassessment right so there is this is not necessarily a re-recruit essence a reappearance of coronavirus and they say this in the in the article that we don't know what this represents other experts said faulty tests may be playing a role or remnants of the virus may still be present in the patient system but may not be infectious or danger or up danger to the host or others I think that is the most likely scenario
The handful of rare cases where people have tested positive after recovering from the disease could also be due to testing errors as mentioned previously.