Andrew Huberman· PhD
the true people that you want to back that can do it, basically what you find is they've spent five or ten or 20 years obsessing on the details of whatever it is they're about to do.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the true people that you want to back that can do it, basically what you find is they've spent five or ten or 20 years obsessing on the details of whatever it is they're about to do.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.