The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
we also know that there are sight specific differences that are read out as weight and here it works in both males and females the Michigan mice are always controls are about 10% lighter both in males and females than mice at the other two sites
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
it only translates to a survival benefit in the males and not the females you have the fact's right it's the causality that's uncertain
the Michigan mice are always controls are about 10% lighter both in males and females than mice at the other two sites
it only translates to a survival benefit in the males and not the females you have the facts right it's the cause ity that's uncertain we don't know whether the difference in survival in the males has anything to do with what's causing the weight difference