The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and so that's why kind of the best way to do it is to do both so you would get your long continuous and and I would say the reason that that's this the stitching together is problematic is because um bacteria have redundant genes and so some bacteria might have you know five copies of a gene versus another bacteria that has 10 copies of a gene and it turns out that matters
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and so that's why kind of the the best way to do it is to do both