Andrew Huberman· PhD
whereas short wavelength light which only hits that epidermal layer on the outside of the skin may be bad for our skin and I say maybe because it's really a function of dose and timing and genetic background
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
whereas short wavelength light which only hits that epidermal layer on the outside of the skin may be bad for our skin and I say maybe because it's really a function of dose and timing and genetic background
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.