The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the craving is the prediction or the meaning that you assign to that cue often happens relatively automatically or quickly so you see the plate of cookies and you think um oh that'll be sweet sugary tasty enjoyable it's that favorable meaning that leads to that dopamine spike that we talked about and that motivates you to take the third step which is the response
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.