The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
to make me happy it has to be an anti-aging drug and the evidence has to be effects on many different age sensitive properties but we have great evidence now for at least three mutants and the calor restriction diet and the methionine restriction diet and we're getting there for rapamycin and several of the other drugs that came along you know five years eight years after that
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
make me happy it has to be an anti-aging drug and the evidence has to be effects on many different age sensitive properties