Peter Attia· MD
you can make a great decision and things can go horribly wrong and you can make a bad decision and things can be fine
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you can make a great decision and things can go horribly wrong and you can make a bad decision and things can be fine
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
you can have great outcomes because there was going to be a great outcome regardless of your decision and then you can have great outcomes where you actually made the wrong decision and you got the right outcome