The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it's kind of cool because it means hey we can eat a lot of different diets and probably thrive from a gi perspective just like our ancestors have you know the mongols eating blood and and milk and and meat and and some for a lot of the year the inuits eating similar diets the the hodgson eating a lot of animal meat and organs and then some fiber and berries and baobab and having a shift in terms of seasonality in terms of their guts
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.