The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you may see the term ermey you may see the term hertzme but these are essentially different samples that you take from around the home so you may get like a rag or a swab or a napkin and you'll go wipe the the ductwork you'll go like wipe the intake vent or wipe the vent in your bathroom or wipe your countertop you go and you gather dust from different surfaces in the home and then you put it into a ziploc bag and you get it back to the lab
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so you may see the term ermey you may see the term hertzme but these are essentially different samples that you take from around the home so you may get like a rag or a swab or a napkin and you'll go wipe the the ductwork you'll go like wipe the intake vent or wipe the vent in your bathroom or wipe your countertop you go and you gather dust from different surfaces in the home and then you put it into a ziploc bag and you get it back to the lab