The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I think the first cases um they were actually doing surgery like under general laparoscopic I believe. Yeah. To um retrieve the eggs. Oh wow. And then they were combining the eggs with the sperm in the test tube putriish and then um I think they were transferring the embryo maybe back into the tube in those days or maybe through the cervix.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
First successful IVF baby, 1978, if my memory serves correctly.