The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
are they sitting down when you when they walk in the room are they sitting down are they looking at you in the eye are they talking to you um do do you feel like you're being rushed I think that's big sign if you feel like you're being rushed you probably are being rushed uh and so just the ability to listen have someone that you're you're is listening to you
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so I think that's a good you're not going to know until you meet them and and some people some people mesh well with people other people don't and what are some questions that they can ask specifically to get a better sense of um you know a person's competence basically it's a it's a good question I think if if you just have to it's a that's a good question I think just again the Rapport you're having with the person let's say for example they say I think you need surgery just a simple question or are there Alternatives or what are the Alternatives or why do you think I need surgery now and I can't do Nana you know is there are there any non-operative approaches to it and just the answer right you know right off the bat you could get a