Andrew Huberman· PhD
So it basically stems from Darwin's theory of sexual selection, and most people, when they think about evolution, they think about, the cliche is like survival of the fittest or nature, red in tooth and claw.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So it basically stems from Darwin's theory of sexual selection, and most people, when they think about evolution, they think about, the cliche is like survival of the fittest or nature, red in tooth and claw.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.