Paul Saladino· MD
Plant-based burgers do not do this mono crop agriculture does not do this these are carbon positive things
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Plant-based burgers do not do this mono crop agriculture does not do this these are carbon positive things
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
you need animals on the soil to keep carbon in the soil so that you can grow plants in the soil so the plants will feed the animals if animals go away from the land the land honest look at mono crop agriculture but depletes the land of nutrients
the best way to improve the quality of soil much more quickly than 50 years is to put animals on that land the poop and peeing of the animals brings more nutrients to the soil and regenerates the land much more quickly than it does without animals on it