The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
If the mechanism is the the DNA essentially or the quality of the sperm, then those lifestyle tenants in the 90 days prior to getting sperm or banking it or using an IVF cycle probably matter the most and I would make sure I would want to be controlling all of those factors I was so I wasn't adding to risk.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.