Rhonda Patrick· PhD
I mean, you're talking about, you know, to some, I mean, it's a pretty minimum effective dose to get 30 to 40% reduction in all-cause mortality and cancer mortality, right?
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
I mean, you're talking about, you know, to some, I mean, it's a pretty minimum effective dose to get 30 to 40% reduction in all-cause mortality and cancer mortality, right?
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
But for some people that are just generally wanting to get, you know, a 50% reduction or something like that, maybe, you know, doing 60, 75 minutes a week would.
You know, 30 minutes of VILPA-like efforts have also been shown to be associated with this.
and these benefits extend even to individuals who identify themselves as non-exercisers in other words these are people that are not um necessarily doing Leisure Time activity they're not going to the gym they're not going on runs but they're still engaging in these vilpas so so even those people are getting mortality reductions and you know cancer mortality cardiovascular mortality reductions with vilpas