Paul Saladino· MD
for hurt immunity we would need 60% of the popular have antibodies or at least 60% of the population to be immunologically ready for coronavirus
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
for hurt immunity we would need 60% of the popular have antibodies or at least 60% of the population to be immunologically ready for coronavirus
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I think it's still gonna be 60 to 70 percent it's just that there's a higher percentage of people who have immunity already
for most common viruses it's around sixty or seventy percent