The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
um males should probably not wait until they're trying to conceive in order to assess their reproductive Health at the level of sperm quality um testosterone levels perhaps but at least sperm quality but um but perhaps men should also be freezing their sperm if in fact conceiving children after 40 places their children at far greater risk for autism
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
At the end of the day, when you have an opportunity to bank sperm younger, it would make sense and utilize that preferentially.