Andrew Huberman· PhD
cuz cannabis itself realistically from what I understand from the botanist that I've talked to you can't really grow a plant that's going to exceed more than 25 to 30% THC just by sheer biology
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
cuz cannabis itself realistically from what I understand from the botanist that I've talked to you can't really grow a plant that's going to exceed more than 25 to 30% THC just by sheer biology
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.