The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
would you take a vaccine that had a 0.1% mortality I would be very difficult to make that case unless you're over I don't know what age you wouldn't even necessarily just say over seventy if you believe because even though the mortality over 70 once you have it is high you have to be multiplying that by the probability that you would contract it
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.