The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the advantage that existed from a titration perspective was with like 70s weed there's a large window to titrate so people could you know take small amounts and not overc consume let's say because there was a much lower concentration of THC in the plant so they're able to consume assume you know even if they were doing it relatively fast because of how little THC was coming into the system it was a little easier to scale that
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.