The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
so we have what are called antigen presenting cells you have cells that go around sampling peptides and they will on these things called MHC class receptors bring the peptide up to the surface and serve it up to the t- cell
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so we have what are called antigen presenting cells you have cells that go around sampling peptides and they will on these things called MHC class receptors bring the peptide up to the surface and serve it up to the te- cell
so we have something called called an antigen so an antigen is an antibody generating peptide so it's a it's a it's a protein almost always a protein they can be carbohydrates but they're almost always proteins and they're very very small peptides like we're talking as little as nine amino acids maybe up to 20 amino acids so teeny tiny little peptides