The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and a little bit after this time the chief medical officer Paul goldenheim the chief medical officer of Purdue Pharma is brought in front of Congress right and he's asked questions about this what does he say same thing he says we had no inkling that there was any kind of a big problem until this hinge point which is when this us attorney writes this letter in uh in 2000
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and it's only in in early 2000 when the United States Attorney for the state of Maine writes a letter to thousands of Physicians saying this drug Oxycontin is is really dangerous actually it's killing people people are overdosing we got we got a real problem here and there's a crime problem associated with it