The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And in fact, we did this really cool study with Virginia Sturm at UC San Francisco, brain health, old people go out on an awok once a week for eight weeks, 75 years old or older, and all we asked them to do was to go from small to vast and how they looked at things. you know, look at a tree, look at a leaf, go out to the pattern of leaves. It brought them all and less physical pain uh over eight weeks and now we're finding six years later better brain health. Right.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.