The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and so then what we call generic epinephrine devices started to be made other companies started to hit the road there's other uh devices now that can be used called the avue so I think luckily now thanks to many Industries involved in this there's also potentially a nasal Epi that can be used
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
that company was my land and they were making epipens and that's why I called it injectable epidrin device because now there's a lot of them thank goodness or the FDA other agencies got involved and said okay this is not right you cannot keep charging that enormous amount of money and so then what we call generic epinephrine devices started to be made other companies started to hit the road there's other uh devices now that can be used called the avue so I think luckily now