Andrew Huberman· PhD
So resting metabolic rate is a big part of that, but it's not the only thing. So that's usually about 50% to 70%. And sedentary people will be on the higher end of that.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
So resting metabolic rate is a big part of that, but it's not the only thing. So that's usually about 50% to 70%. And sedentary people will be on the higher end of that.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we have our BMR which is about in terms of the energy outside of things and I guess I should Define that energy out is your total daily energy expenditure so all the energy you spend in a day that's your TDE we call it and the biggest portion of that is your BMR for most people now if you're an elite athlete who trains like six eight hours a day you can get to the point where your physical activity is actually greater than your BMR
now let's talk about the energy outside of things because this is way more complicated so there's different ways people have broken it down but essentially you have your your your BMR which is your basil metabolic rate and what that that's usually about 50 to 70% of the energy people expend per day and it the way I tell it is it's basically the cost of keeping the lights on and we would determine that if you were putting somebody in a metabolic chamber I believe that we don't require them to be sleeping but it's laying up laying there but being awake correct