Peter Attia· MD
getting more to that upper limit of what these you know committees are recommending so 300 minutes a week of moderate intensity exercise um or maybe 100 50 minutes more of like what they would Define as vigorous
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
getting more to that upper limit of what these you know committees are recommending so 300 minutes a week of moderate intensity exercise um or maybe 100 50 minutes more of like what they would Define as vigorous
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
but any any amount is beneficial so it's not like you know oh well I can't do 300 minutes there I shouldn't even care well that's not true because there is there are benefits you know even with like any type of physical activity
I would argue the data really I would say suggests that you actually probably need to do more exercise um to sort of reap the cancer preventative benefits than you do cardiovascular benefits
High-intensity exercise appears to be especially effective at reducing cancer risk and enhancing cancer treatment efficacy.