The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
When I see patients walk with hix rigidist for example they can't roll through their foot. So they can't push off at 45 degrees out of their big toe. So now what they have to adopt is this is what their foot looks like. So they more knee flexion. for example, >> and then their hip has to be hiked with everyction, right?
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
even if patients have a fusion in their big toe, even if they have hix rigidus, you've lost range at one joint, but you haven't lost range at your ankle and you haven't lost range at your knee or your hip. those range of motion, those ranges of motion will be compromised. But let's just train them. Let's rocker you through the big toe. Let's give you drills to give you knee extension, to give you hip extension because we know you're not going to have access to it any longer. So, let's just give you things to work on.