The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
The disclosure that, we should say, the emotionally intense writing group and the control group did not differ at baseline on any symptom measures or psychological variables, they tell us, and at least at face value, somewhat disappointingly, there really wasn't any kind of difference in outcome between the group that wrote about the very emotionally intense stuff versus non-emotionally intense.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.