Bryan Johnson· Author
also we have things like this device it measures Advanced gly impend products so basically junk build up in the skin you put your arm on this thing and it measures it
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
also we have things like this device it measures Advanced gly impend products so basically junk build up in the skin you put your arm on this thing and it measures it
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so this particular reader you can see here you can find age on the bottom on the x- axis here and the result is your y-AIS so for example if you're 20 years old you want to have you'll be right here on the result for normal one line below standard deviation is better than normal the one is above I was my first measurements were in the red like I was really bad and so this again is looking at cardiovas vascular health for the skin so whether you're looking at UV damage or or Browns or Reds or por size uh we're looking at the the skin Health across the entire body