David Sinclair· PhD
Without those, we didn't get vision restoration, and the clock didn't go back. So what that tells us is the clock going backwards is doable. there is a reset switch in the body, and that the clock is part of that system.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Without those, we didn't get vision restoration, and the clock didn't go back. So what that tells us is the clock going backwards is doable. there is a reset switch in the body, and that the clock is part of that system.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.