The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I'm an advocate for fewer things on, you know, not having all this stuff on our bodies. There's so much we can get out of the computer vision side, you know, from how, you know, the cameras in our spaces and how they're supporting us in our rooms, in our the sensors on our in our um you know, I brought up HVAC systems earlier. So now you've got you effectively a digital twin that's track, you know, and sensors that are tracking my metabolic rates just in my space.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.